ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Digital Crowns Versus Prefabricated Crowns on Primary Teeth
Badly decayed primary molars will be treated by performing the pulp therapy technique indicated, then the patients will be randomized into two groups to receive the restorative intervention. For the intervention group, teeth will be prepared to receive the digital crown after intraoral scanning while for the control group, teeth will be prepared to receive the prefabricated zirconia crowns. Teeth will be followed up clinically for 1 year, at 1, 6 and 12 months.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical & Radiographic Evaluation of Zinc Oxide-Ozonated Oil as a New Primary Root Canal Filling#839273
- Evaluation of Bone Regeneration After Apical Surgery Using Advanced Platelet-rich Fibrin: Utilization of Ultrasound for the Assessment of Periapical Lesions#900020
- Indirect Pulp Treatment in Primary Molars#830870
- Dental Pulp Regeneration by Autologous Tissue Transplantation#801486
- 3D-printed Endocrowns Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Pulpally-treated Primary Molars#915963
Record · ID 1008957
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive