Conceptio › Archive › ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov public full text Public Domain

3D-printed Endocrowns Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Pulpally-treated Primary Molars

Ain Shams University · 2021
ClinicalTrials.gov · Datasets · License: Public Domain · 2021
Open Source ↗
3d-printing
Aim of the study : to compare between 3D printed microfilled hybrid composite endocrowns and prefabricated zirconia crowns for restoring pulpally treated primary molars regarding the following aspects: In Vivo aspects Patient satisfaction \*The esthetic, functional and biological performance according to FDI clinical criteria. At 3, 6 and 12 months In Vitro aspects: * Marginal gap. * Fracture resistance. Study methodology: This study is a combined randomized clinical trial and in vitro study .The study will be conducted at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University as follows: In vivo comparison of the clinical performance of 3D printed Endocrowns versus prefabricated zirconia crowns regarding esthetic, functional and biological performance according to FDI clinical criteria. In vitro evaluation of the marginal gap and fracture resistance of both types of restorations.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 915963
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive