arXiv (All)
open access
The Non-Orientable Topology of Condorcet's Paradox
Preference cycles are prevalent in problems of decision-making, and are contradictory when preferences are assumed to be transitive. This contradiction underlies Condorcet's Paradox, a pioneering result of social choice theory, wherein intuitive and seemingly desirable constraints on decision-making
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Cognitive constraints govern collective outcomes in strategic network formation#1040331
- The Impact of Complexity on Risky Choices: An Evidence Accumulation Account#428531
- Libertarian Free Will and the Physical Indeterminism Luck Objection#754769
- Stochastic consensus dynamics for decentralized decision systems#1037137
- Is a Fourth Contingency Necessary in Social Theory? A Constructive Critique#1081978
Record · ID 1011029
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive