arXiv (All)
open access
Statistical inference with win statistics in cluster-randomized trials with hierarchical composite outcomes
Win statistics have become increasingly popular for analyzing hierarchical composite endpoints in clinical trials. The win ratio, win odds, net benefit, and desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) share a pairwise-comparison framework and provide complementary summaries of treatment benefit. Despite
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Diagnosing LLM Reranker Behavior Under Fixed Evidence Pools#984997
- Toward Efficient Estimation of Regional Treatment Effects in Multi-Regional Clinical Trials#616616
- Toward Efficient Estimation of Regional Treatment Effects in Multi-Regional Clinical Trials#616116
- Global Inequalities in Clinical Trials Participation#633114
- How Wrong Can a Rank-Based Sample-Size Calculation Be? A Sharp Bound of 16/9 for Ordinal Outcomes#974686
Record · ID 1011084
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive