arXiv (All)
open access
Diagnosing LLM Reranker Behavior Under Fixed Evidence Pools
Standard reranking evaluations study how a reranker orders candidates returned by an upstream retriever. This setup couples ranking behavior with retrieval quality, so differences in output cannot be attributed to the ranking policy alone. We introduce a controlled diagnostic for reranking that uses
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AdaTutoRank: Learning to Rerank Document Sets via Adaptive Tutoring Optimization for RAG and Deep Research#1116803
- SumRank: Aligning Summarization Models for Long-Document Listwise Reranking#998158
- The General Stability of Ranking#332623
- GroundedGEO: Auditing the Evidence Gap in Generative Search Rankings#1051682
- Equal Ranking Quality, Different Decisions: Measuring and Reducing Order Dependence in LLM Scorers#1117563
Record · ID 984997
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive