arXiv (All)
open access
Locating Hidden Failures Makes Long-Horizon Agents More Reliable
As AI agents take on long, autonomous tasks, we increasingly oversee rather than perform the work, yet we still judge them almost entirely by whether they finally succeed. An outcome cannot reveal where a run went wrong, whether the agent recovered, or the irreversible harm it caused along the way,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- FARM: Reading Failure Signals from the Internal Predictive States of a Frozen Robotic World Model#998974
- Governing Distributed Systems with Intelligent Agents#688968
- Catastrophically Dangerous AI is Possible Before 2030#773975
- The Fable Myth meets Versioning#688628
- Assessing the future plausibility of catastrophically dangerous AI#774065
Record · ID 1011642
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive