arXiv (All)
open access
Towards Proactive Detection of User-Side Implicit Conflicts in Human-LLM Dialogue
In Human-LLM dialogue, follow-up user utterances may implicitly conflict with earlier intents, leading the LLM to misinterpret user needs and generate inappropriate responses. A reliable dialogue system should proactively detect user-side conflicts before generating a response and seek clarification
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When Text Misleads: Inconsistent-Aware Reasoning for Audio-Grounded Dialogue#973357
- DD-GEPA: Prompt Optimization for Dialogue Disentanglement Focusing on Task Instruction and Utterance Representation#267734
- Benevolent Bias in Multi-Turn Human-Agent Dialogue#794021
- Benevolent Bias in Multi-Turn Human-Agent Dialogue#790002
- Lost with a Map: Conversational State and Behavioral Reliability in Language Models#1118956
Record · ID 1013756
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive