Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
metadata only
Can a Court Change the Law by Saying Nothing?
Can an appellate court alter substantive law without writing an opinion? We attempt to answer that question by conducting a novel empirical investigation into how the Federal Circuit has implemented the Supreme Court's 2014 ruling in Alice v. CLS Bank, the most recent in a series of Supreme Court de
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Logic Without Experience: The Problem of Federal Appellate Courts#1019395
- Should Judicial Opinions Be Read like Statutes?#445364
- Measuring Jurisprudence#1177826
- Some Reasons for a Restoration of Natural Law Jurisprudence#1178046
- On the role of prototypes in appellate legal argument (abstract)#660227
Record · ID 1019617
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive