OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
Measuring Jurisprudence
Abstract Legal jurisprudence is widely debated but rarely measured. We present the first comprehensive measure of jurisprudence in U.S. Supreme Court opinions from 1870 to 2024. Building on qualitative studies of legal reasoning, we classify court opinions into two contrasting types: “formal” reason
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Less Incorrect Ways of Doing Jurisprudence#1177771
- “Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning”#269855
- " Rethinking Theory: The Question of Distributive Justice in Jurisprudence "#1177881
- Modern Trend and Role of Jurisprudence in this Era#1178077
- Natural Type of Law Understanding as Jurisprudence Activity Based Theory Basis#335545
Record · ID 1177826
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive