Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
metadata only
Enjoining Abuse: The Case for Indefinite Domestic Violence Protection Orders
While countless studies demonstrate the complex and dangerous nature of intimate partner abuse, most jurisdictions permit only the entry of yearlong domestic violence protection orders. Judges may assume that danger ceases once the order takes effect, but evidence of the recurrent nature of violence
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- 29 U.S.C. § 101 — Issuance of restraining orders and injunctions; limitation; public policy#584168
- Domestic Violence and Power Abuse Within the Family: The Restorative Justice Approach#732289
- Disrupting the Domestic-to-Academic Abuse Relay (DAR): A Framework for Naming and Interrupting the Domestic-to-Academic Handoff of Violence#406844
- Educational and skills-based interventions for preventing relationship and dating violence in adolescents and young adults.#421273
- 30 U.S.C. § 960 — Limitation on issuance of temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction#584488
Record · ID 1019777
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive