Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
metadata only
Is Federalization of Charity Law All Bad? What States Can Learn from the Internal Revenue Code
Professor Ascher makes a compelling case that federal law, and especially the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"), has eclipsed state law as the predominate regulating force of the charitable sector. Professor Ascher views this trend with trepidation-he criticizes the Code for imposing a "frightening
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Supererogation and the Limits of Moral Obligations. Guest Editor’s Preface#737867
- Payment integrity in government programs: Takeaways from incorporating the behavioral sciences in US federal evaluations.#371586
- 45 U.S.C. § 366a — Effect of Internal Revenue Code#597601
- Market, Ethics, and Morality#1154646
- <em>Krishna v. Lee</em> Extricates the Inextricable: An Argument for Regulating the Solicitation in Charitable Solicitations#1020138
Record · ID 1019789
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive