Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
<em>Krishna v. Lee</em> Extricates the Inextricable: An Argument for Regulating the Solicitation in Charitable Solicitations
This Comment argues that, in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Society for Krishna Consciousness v. Lee, state and local regulations are more likely to pass federal constitutional muster if they regulate obnoxious fundraising practices defined with sufficient precision. The Riley trilogy a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- In re Google Android Consumer Privacy Litigation#624414
- Is Federalization of Charity Law All Bad? What States Can Learn from the Internal Revenue Code#1019789
- LLM 8311 - Public procurement law and policy#956543
- SECURITIES CLASS ACTIONS IN STATE COURT#494786
- Impact of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 on Charitable Giving#941768
Record · ID 1020138
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive