Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
<em>In re Puget Sound Power and Light Company</em>: Eminent Domain by Corporations Reevaluated
This note examines In re Puget Sound Power and Light Company and the court’s holding that due process requires a private condemnor to prove public use and necessity by a preponderance of the evidence. The note recognizes that the court correctly shifted the burden of proof to the condemnor, but ar
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- 43 U.S.C. § 2501 — “Suspended entries of public lands” and “suspended preemption land claims”#595635
- On the Propriety of the Public Interest Requirement in the Washington Consumer Protection Act—Wash. Rev. Code § 19.86#1020005
- Dashed "Investment-Backed" Expectations: Will the Constitution Protect Property Owners from Excesses in Implementation of the Growth Management Act?#1020107
- Rescuing the Bundle-of-Rights Metaphor in Property Law#494949
- A Concerted Effort: How the Roberts Court Demolished Anti-Gerrymandering Protections#425782
Record · ID 1019892
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive