Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
Dashed "Investment-Backed" Expectations: Will the Constitution Protect Property Owners from Excesses in Implementation of the Growth Management Act?
Section I briefly discusses the basic principles of takings law as enunciated by prior cases, as well as the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, and the Washington Supreme Court's recent decisions in Sintra, Inc. v. Seattle and Robinson v. Seattl
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- 5 U.S.C. § 553 — Rule making#556591
- 15 U.S.C. § 1461 — Effect upon State law#566723
- <em>In re Puget Sound Power and Light Company</em>: Eminent Domain by Corporations Reevaluated#1019892
- The Property Question#726288
- Reading Symbolic Capital#71112
Record · ID 1020107
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive