Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
Back to the Future: Use of Percentage Fee Arrangements in Common Fund Litigation
The premise of this Article is that common fund litigation will be most efficiently and beneficially prosecuted if attorney fees are awarded under a methodology that makes parallel the interests of counsel in the fee award and of the class in the recovery. The Article examines the historical uses o
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Zombie Litigation: Claim Aggregation, Litigant Autonomy and Funders' Intermeddling#1055187
- Traité pratique et juridique de l'arbitrage et de l'expertise, avec la jurisprudence, par Henri Ravon,...#12224
- A Derivatives Market in Legal Academia#648362
- 28 U.S.C. § 2515 — New trial; stay of judgment#556728
- H.L.A. Hart’s Lost Essay: Discretion and the Legal Process School#767313
Record · ID 1019994
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive