Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
Recovery of Pure Economic Loss in Product Liability Actions: An Economic Comparison of Three Legal Rules
This Comment argues that in the allocation of pure economic loss caused by product failure, the negligence rule is generally more efficient than a strict liability rule and that a contract rule is almost always more efficient than a negligence rule. Part II presents a general discussion of the attri
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Economic Theories of Legal Liability#269731
- DISCLAIMERS AND LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY IN DIGITAL CONTRACTS: THE CASE OF CLOUD COMPUTING AND SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SaaS) CONTRACTS#681809
- Prospects of Welfare Losses#689451
- Compensation for Mere Exposure to Risk#775699
- Axiomatic Theory of Tragic Subjecthood (ATTS): Ontological Foundation of Moral Systems#122400
Record · ID 1020014
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive