arXiv (All)
open access
An Analysis of Training-Free Self-Reported Confidence in Language Models
Large language models can report a numerical confidence together with generated content, but it is unclear whether this report is more than calibrated rhetoric. We analyze three training-free signals: confidence verbalized with the answer, post-hoc $P(\mathrm{True})$, and agreement with three additi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Calibrated Reflection Approach for Enhancing Confidence Estimation in LLMs#927819
- When Linguistic and Internal Confidence Diverge in Large Language Models#927455
- ConfRAG: Confidence-Guided Retrieval-Augmenting Generation#927137
- LLMs learn different forms of metacognition when trained to predict their own accuracy#1118959
- The Computational Basis of Confidence in Large Language Models#366283
Record · ID 1034355
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive