arXiv (All)
open access
LLMs learn different forms of metacognition when trained to predict their own accuracy
Large language models are trained to always produce an answer, regardless of whether they possess the relevant knowledge, which leads them to fabricate facts. Prior work has shown that LLMs' confidence estimates correspond poorly to their actual performance, and that fine-tuning can substantially im
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When Linguistic and Internal Confidence Diverge in Large Language Models#927455
- A Calibrated Reflection Approach for Enhancing Confidence Estimation in LLMs#927819
- Fact-Checking Using AI#1148311
- Fact-Checking Using AI#1148234
- Fact-Checking Using AI#1081550
Record · ID 1118959
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive