arXiv (All)
open access
When AI Reviews Train AI Reviewers: Scientific-Judgment Collapse and Mitigation
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly participate in scientific evaluation, both as automated reviewers and as assistants to human reviewers. As model-generated reviews enter public data and future training corpora, AI peer review can become recursive: later reviewers learn from judgments produc
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond the Gatekeeper: A Framework for AI-Assisted Open Peer Review and Decentralized Scientific Evaluation#691781
- LitReview Arena: Evaluating Literature Review Agents with Battle-Style Peer Review Platform#1129367
- CALIBRATED AI REVIEWER: AN ALGORITHM FOR COMPARING SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS WITH HIGH AND LOW ENTRY BARRIERS#141283
- "Is This Book AI-Generated?" How Authorship Suspicion Manifests in Marketplace Reviews#1119023
- Reviewer Agreement and Phrase-Based Profiles#692141
Record · ID 1034916
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive