arXiv (All)
open access
LitReview Arena: Evaluating Literature Review Agents with Battle-Style Peer Review Platform
Literature reviews are essential to scientific progress, but rigorously evaluating automatically generated reviews remains difficult because many aspects of research utility depend on expert judgment rather than reference-overlap metrics. We introduce LitReview Arena, a battle-style evaluation platf
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reviewer Agreement and Phrase-Based Profiles#692141
- Evaluation of Elicit, SciSpace and Nested Knowledge in replicating three systematic reviews#976910
- Checkpoints Are Not Enough: Trust Calibration in CoSLR, a Human-AI System for Systematic Literature Reviews#1036931
- Citation-Grounded Historical Phrase Profiles for Reviewer Agreement Forecasting#695631
- PRISMA-LLM: An Empirical Reporting Framework for AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews#673570
Record · ID 1129367
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive