arXiv (All)
open access
Fewer Steps, Better Actions: Rethinking Flow-Matching Inference for VLA Policies
Vision-language-action (VLA) policies based on flow matching generate action chunks through repeated evaluations of an action expert. Increasing the number of integration steps raises inference cost, but does not necessarily improve closed-loop success. We propose Coda, which reallocates part of thi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies#998490
- BLUE: Toward Better Language Use in Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving#793721
- BLUE: Toward Better Language Use in Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving#789717
- DriftOPD: Sequence-Level Reverse-KL Distillation for One-Step VLA Policies#1154940
- Decoupled Early Exits for Task-Dependent Compute Allocation in Flow-Matching VLAs#1077311
Record · ID 1035182
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive