arXiv (All)
open access
Goal-Oriented Reactive Simulation for Closed-Loop Trajectory Prediction
Current trajectory prediction models are primarily trained in an open-loop manner, which often leads to covariate shift and compounding errors when deployed in real-world, closed-loop settings. Furthermore, relying on static datasets or non-reactive log-replay simulators severs the interactive loop,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- EarthVerse: Benchmarking Scientific Agents Across Dynamic Earth Systems and Natural Hazards#482163
- Monitoring strategies for continuous evaluation of deployed clinical prediction models.#263021
- Continuous benchmarking: Keeping pace with an evolving ecosystem of models and technologies#31243
- AD-MPCC: Adaptive Differentiable Model Predictive Contouring Control for Autonomous Racing#1070474
- CrowdTraj: A Benchmark for Dense Crowd Trajectory Prediction in Realistic Crowded Environments#984590
Record · ID 1035438
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive