arXiv (All)
open access
JudgeSense: A Benchmark for Prompt Sensitivity in LLM-as-a-Judge Systems
Large language models are widely used to judge the output of other language models, yet whether a judge returns the same verdict when the same request is worded differently remains largely unexamined. We study that question across four evaluation tasks and twenty-five judges from six providers. To s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DIAL: Position-Debiased LLM Judges with Adaptive Human Preference Calibration#1105773
- Binarization Flattens the Score Space#1130639
- JEV-as-a-Judge: Accept When Confident, Escalate When Unsure#1062439
- JEV-as-a-Judge: Accept When Confident, Escalate When Unsure#1043135
- Human-Anchored Factuality Evaluation with Strategic Annotation#819938
Record · ID 1035473
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive