arXiv (All)
open access
JEV-as-a-Judge: Accept When Confident, Escalate When Unsure
LLM-as-a-judge enables evaluation across diverse tasks, but inference cost and confidence reliability become critical at scale. We study whether a decision-only judge can provide an economical first pass and identify when stronger evaluation is needed. Comparing jev-as-a-judge with sixteen generativ
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- JEV-as-a-Judge: Accept When Confident, Escalate When Unsure#1043135
- JudgeSense: A Benchmark for Prompt Sensitivity in LLM-as-a-Judge Systems#1035473
- Fairness trade-offs in expert evaluation: information, judgment, and procedural design#428767
- Post-hoc Alignment of LLM-judges to Human Judgment Distribution#821056
- Human-Anchored Factuality Evaluation with Strategic Annotation#819938
Record · ID 1062439
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive