arXiv (All)
open access
Monocultural Biases: Correlated biases in large language models lead to unequal systemic exclusion rates in hiring
Employers are increasingly using large language models (LLMs) to automate their hiring process. This paper investigates the risk of monocultural biases, in which the widespread deployment of large language models homogenizes biases across the labor market, leading to greater systemic exclusion for c
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Apparent Psychological Profiles of Large Language Models are Largely a Measurement Artifact#290636
- Large Language Models Substantially Compress Well-Being Inequality but Largely Preserve Its Socioeconomic Structure#1117767
- White Men Without Degrees Receive the Lowest Ratings from Large Language Models#1154808
- When and Why Do Linear Bias Probes Fail? A Geometric and Statistical Theory of Bias Detectability in Large Language Model Representations#1037020
- Probing Cultural Signals in Large Language Models through Author Profiling#920291
Record · ID 1036852
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive