arXiv (All)
open access
When and Why Do Linear Bias Probes Fail? A Geometric and Statistical Theory of Bias Detectability in Large Language Model Representations
Linear probing is the standard instrument for detecting social biases in the hidden representations of large language models. Yet reported probe accuracies come almost exclusively from \emph{counterfactual} evaluations in which every input carries an explicit demographic marker. Once only a fraction
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Monocultural Biases: Correlated biases in large language models lead to unequal systemic exclusion rates in hiring#1036852
- Mitigate One, Skew Another? Tackling Intersectional Biases in Text-to-Image Models#75240
- Probing Cultural Signals in Large Language Models through Author Profiling#924522
- Probing Cultural Signals in Large Language Models through Author Profiling#920291
- The Limits of Simulated Societies: How Post-Training and Survey Fine-Tuning Erase Cross-Cultural Variance#1061393
Record · ID 1037020
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive