arXiv (All)
open access
Checkpoints Are Not Enough: Trust Calibration in CoSLR, a Human-AI System for Systematic Literature Reviews
Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) are essential for evidence-based research but remain time-consuming, requiring researchers to manage large volumes of publications across planning, screening, analysis, and reporting. Large language models (LLMs) can now produce fluent, well-structured review tex
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of Elicit, SciSpace and Nested Knowledge in replicating three systematic reviews#976910
- SciLitBench: Benchmark and Design Principles for LLM-Powered Systematic Literature Reviews#972566
- PRISMA-LLM: An Empirical Reporting Framework for AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews#673570
- Beyond the Gatekeeper: A Framework for AI-Assisted Open Peer Review and Decentralized Scientific Evaluation#691781
- PRISMA-LLM: An Empirical Reporting Framework for AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews#1069958
Record · ID 1036931
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive