OSF
open access
Evaluation of Elicit, SciSpace and Nested Knowledge in replicating three systematic reviews
evidence-synthesislibrary-and-information-scienceother-medicine-and-health-sciencespublic-healthsocial-and-behavioral-sciencessystematic-review
The emergence of various AI-enabled systematic review platforms has promised to transform evidence synthesis by providing more rapid, comprehensive and accurate reviews. However, independent validation of these platforms has been limited. Here, we set out to evaluate the performance of Elicit, SciSp
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
OSF
Related documents
- PRISMA-LLM: An Empirical Reporting Framework for AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews#1069958
- SciLitBench: Benchmark and Design Principles for LLM-Powered Systematic Literature Reviews#972566
- Checkpoints Are Not Enough: Trust Calibration in CoSLR, a Human-AI System for Systematic Literature Reviews#1036931
- Observing the Conduct of Systematic Reviews with Generative AI Support: An Experience Report from a Graduate Software Engineering Course#1061962
- LitReview Arena: Evaluating Literature Review Agents with Battle-Style Peer Review Platform#1129367
Record · ID 976910 · SHA-256 181194287ca0a0b3
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive