arXiv (All)
open access
Text, Pixels, or Both? Evaluating Input Representations for Multimodal Document QA
Every document QA system begins with a choice that is rarely studied on its own: whether to feed the model page images, extracted text, or both. We isolate this choice, holding the prompt, judge, and scoring pipeline fixed, across four commercial model endpoints, two corpora, and two context regimes
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DAREBench: Deployment-Aware and Reliable Evaluation of Models as Agents#973669
- Rigel: Self-Distilled Score Adaptation for Image and Video Captioning Evaluation#1109090
- Joint Training Is Not Enough: Conditioned Cross-Granularity Training for Multimodal Document Understanding#820768
- MTVA-Bench: Evaluating the Language Model Inside Cascaded Voice Agents#1033924
- MUSE: A Run-Centric Platform for Multimodal Unified Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models#798785
Record · ID 1037311
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive