arXiv (All)
open access
Human-Level Accuracy, Non-Human Strategies: Revealing Model-Human Divergence in Video Physical Reasoning
Video foundation models now reach human-level accuracy on physical-reasoning benchmarks, yet such tasks require predicting unobserved physical outcomes. Do these models perform human-like forward simulation, or do they exploit statistical regularities in visible scenes? Accuracy alone cannot disting
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- PhysicsLENS: Diagnosing Physical Property Blindness in Video Generation Models#1156097
- VIDEAS: Distilling Explicit Action Semantics from Demonstration Videos for World Models via Prior-Guided Simulation#1118176
- Do Video Foundation Models Understand Intuitive Physics? A Layerwise Probing Analysis#267664
- SpaRRTa: A Synthetic Benchmark for Evaluating Spatial Intelligence in Visual Foundation Models#1014593
- PhysBrain 1.5: From Vision-Language Models to Physical Foundation Models#1084875
Record · ID 1037471
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive