R v IA

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, abca, 2026abca298, 2026 abca 298 (canlii), 2026, abca, 298, (canlii), 2501-0315a, 2026, criminal and statutory offences, youth sentencing, manslaughter, youth criminal justice act, s 42(2)(o) maximum and s 38(3)(d) pre, sentence custody, whether sentencing judge failed to give adequate reasons for partial credit, discretion to grant all, some or no credit discussed, sentence reasons upheld, appeal dismissed, procedure, criminal appeal, new issue on appeal, discretion to consider issues raised for first time on appeal, whether to address illegality argument first raised at oral hearing, scope of submissions and prejudice to respondent considered, court declines to address new issue, appeal dismissed, criminal and statutory offences, sentencing evidence, misapprehension of evidence, cyoc documents and recovery program letter, whether sentencing judge misapprehended programming evidence on accountability and remorse, psychological and risk report under ycja, s 34 considered, no reversible error found, appeal dismissed, criminal and statutory offences, appellate review of sentence, demonstrably unfit, parity and proportionality under ycja, s 38(2)(b), whether sentence was demonstrably unfit compared with r v pd, fit and proportionate sentence affirmed in light of offence and offender factors, appeal dismissed