OSF
open access
Inflated Statistics Lead to Incorrect Inference: How (Not) to Make Cognitive Network Group Comparisons
cognitive-psychologydevelopmental-psychologyfirst-and-second-language-acquisitionlanguage-aquisitionlinguisticssocial-and-behavioral-sciences
Semantic networks are an increasingly popular method for examining the structure of cognitive representations. We identify a pervasive error in group-level network comparisons. This error, embedded in popular statistical software (SemNeT; Christensen & Kenett, 2023), artificially inflates statis
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
OSF
Related documents
- Inflated Statistics Lead to Incorrect Inference: How (Not) to Make Cognitive Network Group Comparisons#1054858
- Cognition on Graph: Navigating Massive Knowledge Space via Cognitive Cycles and Bidirectional Graph-Text Synergy#1070258
- The Price of Meaning: Quantifying Semantic Communication Overheads in Practice#410977
- Artificial Intelligence and Metacognitive Knowledge: LLMs Can Report Decision Weights as Faithfully as Humans in Multi-Attribute Choice#486058
- Culture as Mediator for what is Ready-to-hand: A Phenomenological Exploration of Semantic Networks#764666
Record · ID 1040285 · SHA-256 181194287ca0a0b3
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive