PhilArchive
open access
Confucians Do Not Understand “Heaven”: How Can Tianrenheyi Be Achieved?
“Tianrenheyi” (Unity of Heaven and Humanity) is a core proposition in the Chinese intellectual tradition. However, within the Confucian system it has often been moralized and interpreted under the assumption that humanity occupies the center of the cosmos. This has led, in civilizational practice, to ecological imbalance, technological risk, and systemic crises. From the perspective of scientific-philosophical inquiry, this paper critically examines the philosophical foundations and methodological deficiencies of Confucian Tianrenheyi, identifying its a priori assumptions, moralization, and anthropocentric bias as harmful to modern civilizational governance. The study further proposes the Lao-Yang Tianrenheyi model based on the Lao-Yang Genesis Cosmology, transforming Tianrenheyi from a purely philosophical ideal into a scientific, systemic, and operational civilizational model. Its core lies in the cosmogenic chain of Dao-sheng-wanwu (Dao generates all things) and Dao-fa-ziran (Dao follows natural law): Galaxy → Sun → Earth → Moon → Life → Civilization. Humanity functions as a node within the system, and civilizational development must follow natural constraints and hierarchical adaptation. Employing textual analysis, philosophical critique, cosmological evolution theory, complex systems theory, and natural cybernetics, this paper systematically analyzes the historical development, philosophical deficiencies, and modern dilemmas of Confucian Tianrenheyi. By contrasting it with the Lao-Yang model, it offers scientific-philosophical insights. The findings demonstrate that Lao-Yang Tianrenheyi is decentralized, non-moralized, and verifiable, providing scientific foundations for ecological governance, technological system control, and risk management in modern civilization. The paper further proposes future research directions, including modeling the cosmogenic chain, civilizational simulation, interdisciplinary applications, and long-term strategies for synchronizing civilization with cosmic law. This study demonstrates a possible path for integrating classical philosophy with modern scientific methodology, offering a theoretical and practical framework for the sustainable development of global civilization.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Lao-Yang’s “Dao Generates All Things, Dao Follows Nature”: A Scientific-Philosophical Model of “Unity of Heaven and Humanity”#704674
- The True Wisdom of Chinese Civilization: Lao-Yang Genesis Cosmology#721852
- 天人合一Unity of Heaven and Humanity#707471
- Scientific Interpretation of Laozi’s Dao De Jing#93326
- 儒道之间:傅佩荣思想的内在张力与文明困境 Between Confucianism and Daoism: The Inner Tension and Civilizational Dilemma in Fu Peirong’s Philosophy#107277
Record · ID 104188
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive