Yuridika
metadata only
JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR SELF-RESTRAINT : SOME INSIGHT INTO THE INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
The Constitutional Court of Republic of Indonesia is centralized judicial review institution which implements a posteriori and abstract control. Constitutional court decision often politically sensitive and involve important issues. On the one hand handing down strong decisions that uphold important
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Between Activism and Restraint: Constitutional Interpretation in the Indonesian Constitutional Court#1160382
- PUTUSAN ULTRA PETITA MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PERKARA PENGUJIAN KONSTITUSIONALITAS UNDANG-UNDANG#1026562
- Judicial Ijtihad in Religious Courts for Achieving Substantive Justice in Indonesia#10678
- GAGASAN PENGADUAN KONSTITUSIONAL DAN PENERAPANNYA DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA#1026522
- Judicial Review of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia against Pancasila#10664
Record · ID 1042473
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive