Yuridika
metadata only
Between Activism and Restraint: Constitutional Interpretation in the Indonesian Constitutional Court
Over the past decade, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia has demonstrated a fluctuating tendency between judicial activism and judicial restraint in performing its role as the guardian of the constitution. This article aims to examine how the Court interprets constitutional norms
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR SELF-RESTRAINT : SOME INSIGHT INTO THE INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT#1042473
- PUTUSAN ULTRA PETITA MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PERKARA PENGUJIAN KONSTITUSIONALITAS UNDANG-UNDANG#1026562
- Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice in the Context of the Principle of Equality Between Judicial Activism and Self-restraint#425499
- Feminist Legal Theory as a Review of Legal Philosophy: Its Relation with Gender Equality in Indonesia#1178126
- Critical Jurisprudence of Duncan Kennedy and the Status of the Theory of Legal Interpretation#335407
Record · ID 1160382
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive