ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Laparo-endoscopic Single Site (LESS) Cholecystectomy Versus Standard LAP-CHOLE
The aim of this study is to assess possible differences between the LESS approach and the standard laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy. In particular, the Postoperative Quality of Life (QoL) will be investigated by analyzing the followings: length of hospital stay (LoS), postoperative pain, cosmetics and the results of SF 36 questionnaire. Furthermore, operative time, conversion to standard LC rate, difficulty of exposure, difficulty of dissection, and complication rate will be compared.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- EOIB for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy#813044
- Comparison of "Pick'n Roll" Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Technique, and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy#840800
- The Comparison of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Three Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy#1008953
- Optimal Timings of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After ERCP in Patients With Gallstones Along With CBD Stones#902339
- External Oblique Intercostal Block vs Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy#907435
Record · ID 1044185
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive