ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
The Effectiveness of Two Distinct Ventilation Strategies Escalating Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) and Lung Recruitment Maneuvers in Improving Oxygenation
This study evaluates and compares the effectiveness of two distinct ventilation strategies-escalating PEEP and lung recruitment maneuvers-in improving oxygenation (i.e., managing hypoxemia) in COPD patients undergoing VATS.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Individualized vs Low PEEP in One Lung Ventilation#1171251
- REstricted Versus Liberal Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Patients Without ARDS#904532
- Respiratory Function and Oxygenation in Smokers and Non-smokers#1125030
- Longitudinal Study of Oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (oPEP) in Stable COPD#966209
- Peak Inspiratory Flow in COPD Patients Treated with Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhalers and Spacers: Implications for Inhaler Selection. A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.#621013
Record · ID 1045222
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive