ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Individualized vs Low PEEP in One Lung Ventilation
The aim of the prospective crossover study is to investigate the effect of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on measures of tissue oxygenation, compared with low PEEP.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- REstricted Versus Liberal Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Patients Without ARDS#904532
- Preoxygenation With Optiflow™ in Morbidly Obese Patients is Superior to Face Mask#862069
- OLA to Lowest DP in Cardiac Surgery#857276
- The Effectiveness of Two Distinct Ventilation Strategies Escalating Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) and Lung Recruitment Maneuvers in Improving Oxygenation#1045222
- Singlet Oxygen Quantification After Skin Exposure to Ultraviolet A (UVA) Light#857453
Record · ID 1171251
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive