arXiv (All)
open access
From Concept Alignment to Causal Grounding: An Intervention Test of Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness
Chain-of-thought (CoT) can sound plausible yet be unfaithful to the model's underlying reasoning. Most prior work probes CoT faithfulness through input--output behavior or input attributions, leaving internal computation largely underexplored. We instead cast faithfulness as internal concept groundi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Motivational internalism and folk intuitions#701780
- Reframing Single- and Dual-Process Theories as Cognitive Models: Commentary on De Neys (2021)#74518
- Token Budget Saturation and Mechanistic Early Detection of Reasoning Non-Convergence in Chain-of-Thought Models#394406
- From the Task Boundaries of Narrative Text to Structural Anchoring, Uncertainty Triggers, and Cross-Calibration#1000401
- Thought without systematicity? Evaluating reasoning models on rule induction tasks#1083437
Record · ID 1048460
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive