arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Thought without systematicity? Evaluating reasoning models on rule induction tasks
A central tenet of human cognition is systematicity, the principle that understanding one concept is inherently tied to understanding close variations of that concept. Do reasoning models robustly exhibit such systematicity? If so, we would expect consistent performance on structurally equivalent va
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reframing Single- and Dual-Process Theories as Cognitive Models: Commentary on De Neys (2021)#74518
- On cognitive systems and their logic#688976
- MINIMAL: A Coherence-Driven Cognitive Substrate#87685
- Does SRL Pave the Road to Explainable Reasoning? Lessons Learned from an Implementer's Perspective#926362
- The Most Powerful Mechanism of Logical Thinking Survived in Evolution: Universal Human Relationship–Based Reasoning as a Blueprint for AGI#695834
Record · ID 1083437
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive