arXiv (All)
open access
Machine learning and digital pragmatics: Which word category influences emoji use most?
This study examines the performance of the state-of-the-art MARBERT model in identifying the lexical/pragmatic category associated with emoji use on X within a digital pragmatics approach (DPA). A net corpus of 15856 Colloquial Arabic (CA) posts containing emojis was collected from X using Python. T
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The processing of multi-word expressions in L1 and L2 Chinese: Evidence from reaction times and eye movements#344093
- A Systematic Review of Emoji: Current Research and Future Perspectives#976463
- Emoticon variation: Noses and rotations do not alter meaning, but mouths and mirrorings do#423345
- Do emojis really help us to communicate better? Investigating instructor credibility, students’ learning motivation, and performance#370232
- Mental Imagery and Harmful Language#733397
Record · ID 1048790
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive