arXiv (All)
open access
Evaluative Dynamics of AI Integration and Expert Performance under Epistemic Dependence across Heterogeneous Stakes
AI is increasingly integrated into expert workflows, yet how integration affects perceptions of the expert, AI, and their combination remains unclear in domains where lay users are epistemically dependent on AI-assisted experts. We examine this through a novel controlled medical study (N = 166) and
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Does ChatGPT Undermine Human Epistemic Authority? A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Artificial Intelligence's Challenge to Knowledge Systems#694668
- AI anxiety and AI dependence among undergraduates: a moderated mediation model of AI self-efficacy and AI literacy.#415262
- AI and the scientist: On the fracture of epistemic authority#722535
- The Mediation of AI Trust on AI Uncertainties and AI Competence Among Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.#193712
- The influence of college students' AI literacy on perceived usefulness: a moderated mediation model with AI anxiety and trust across disciplinary backgrounds.#975509
Record · ID 1048881
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive