PhilArchive
open access
AI and the scientist: On the fracture of epistemic authority
The figure of the scientist has long occupied a distinctive place in the epistemic order. From the Enlightenment onward, the scientist was not merely a skilled technician but a disciplined inquirer – a producer and guardian of knowledge – whose legitimacy rested on epistemic virtues such as curiosity, integrity, and humility, as well as on empirical rigour. Today, however, this position appears less secure. The systems we now refer to as ‘artificial intelligence’, and more concretely large language models (LLMs), produce outputs which, in certain domains, rival human work.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Who’s Actually Afraid of Artificial Intelligence (AI?)#731751
- What is AI?#134395
- How AI Models Manage Epistemic Authority: A Taxonomy and Comparative Analysis of Responses to User Disagreement#984571
- Knowledge-Capital Expansion in Modernity: Public Knowledge and Epistemic Capitalization in the Age of Artificial Intelligence#692001
- Evaluative Dynamics of AI Integration and Expert Performance under Epistemic Dependence across Heterogeneous Stakes#1048881
Record · ID 722535
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive