arXiv (All)
open access
HumanAgencyBench: Scalable Evaluation of Human Agency Support in AI Assistants
artificial-intelligencecomputation-and-languagecomputers-and-societyhuman-computer-interactionmachine-learning
As humans delegate more tasks and decisions to artificial intelligence (AI), we risk losing control of our individual and collective futures. Relatively simple algorithmic systems already steer human decision-making, such as social media feed algorithms that lead people to unintentionally and absent
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When Human-in-the-Loop Fails: An Answerability Test for Deployed AI Systems#28983
- When Human-in-the-Loop Fails: An Answerability Test for Deployed AI Systems#28982
- Process Matters more than Output for Distinguishing Humans from Machines#1130545
- XAI Evaluation Cards: A Practical Method for Designing Human-Centred XAI Evaluations#1157359
- AI Behavioral Science: A Framework and Agenda#1155057
Record · ID 1049671
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive