arXiv (All)
open access
XAI Evaluation Cards: A Practical Method for Designing Human-Centred XAI Evaluations
Evaluating explainable AI (XAI) systems from a human-centred approach requires researchers to select from numerous evaluation dimensions and measures, often in an ad hoc and fragmented manner. This paper introduces a method to help HCI, computer science, designers and social science researchers syst
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- WorkWorlds: An Infrastructure for Evaluating AI Agents on Workplace Tasks#1049998
- HumanAgencyBench: Scalable Evaluation of Human Agency Support in AI Assistants#1049671
- Every Eval Ever: A Unifying Schema and Community Repository for AI Evaluation Results#271884
- Interpretable Predictability-Based AI Text Detection: A Replication Study#798802
- Interpretable Predictability-Based AI Text Detection: A Replication Study#797388
Record · ID 1157359
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive