arXiv (All)
open access
Agents That Edit Documents: Measuring Agentic PDF Forgery Against a Non-Agentic Control
AI agents that carry a multi-step computer task through on their own became ordinary tools in the past year, and the same autonomy is available to anyone whose task is harmful. We ask what that means for a relying party -- an insurer, a lender, an auditor -- whose evidence is a filed PDF. AgentForge
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Agents That Edit Documents: Measuring Agentic PDF Forgery Against a Non-Agentic Control#1028604
- Don't Let AI Agents YOLO Your Files: Shifting Information and Control to Filesystems for Agent Safety and Autonomy#19086
- Don't Let AI Agents YOLO Your Files: Shifting Information and Control to Filesystems for Agent Safety and Autonomy#14105
- Source-Dependent Deference in Medical Imaging Agents Under Falsified Findings: A Pilot Audit#798426
- Source-Dependent Deference in Medical Imaging Agents Under Falsified Findings: A Pilot Audit#797013
Record · ID 1050142
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive