arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Source-Dependent Deference in Medical Imaging Agents Under Falsified Findings: A Pilot Audit
Tool-using agents are being proposed for medical imaging, and their behaviour when a tool returns a false finding is largely unmeasured. We audit whether a ReAct-style tool-calling agent abandons an answer it has already given correctly once a falsified finding arrives, and whether that depends on h
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Source-Dependent Deference in Medical Imaging Agents Under Falsified Findings: A Pilot Audit#798426
- Dissecting Agentic Forensics: The Role of Triage, Prompting, and Evidence Arbitration in Open-World Fake Image Detection#1050538
- Dissecting Agentic Forensics: The Role of Triage, Prompting, and Evidence Arbitration in Open-World Fake Image Detection#1028592
- The Exclusion Ratchet: False-Positive Suppression Accumulates and Persists in Detection Rule Repositories#622429
- Agents That Edit Documents: Measuring Agentic PDF Forgery Against a Non-Agentic Control#1050142
Record · ID 797013
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive