arXiv (All)
open access
Evaluating Decision Models for Text Annotation in Computational Social Science
Computational social science increasingly relies on large language models for text annotation, and the validity of published findings now rests on the labels generated by such models. Decision models, a new model class built for categorical question answering, answer typed questions with a choice, a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Choices Speak Louder than Questions#1131383
- How Much Labelled Data Is Enough? A Simulation Study of Prompting Strategies for Unbiased and Reliable LLM-Based Annotation Workflows in Social Sciences#631979
- Beyond Natural Language: An Agent-Native Language for Autonomous Science#1051914
- Human-Anchored Factuality Evaluation with Strategic Annotation#819938
- Researchers waste 80% of LLM annotation costs by classifying one text at a time#16346
Record · ID 1050985
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive