SocArXiv
metadata only
How Much Labelled Data Is Enough? A Simulation Study of Prompting Strategies for Unbiased and Reliable LLM-Based Annotation Workflows in Social Sciences
computational-social-scienceeconomicslarge-language-modelsmeasurementpolitical-sciencepreprintsocial-sciencesociology
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluating Decision Models for Text Annotation in Computational Social Science#1050985
- A Qualitative Analysis of Common Practices in Annotations: A Taxonomy and Design Space#128260
- Profile-associated financial and access-related framing in LLM-generated pediatric asthma referral plans: a factorial audit of seven large language models.#392754
- Researchers waste 80% of LLM annotation costs by classifying one text at a time#16346
- When Does Memory Help? A Cost-Aware Evaluation of Long-Term Memory in Tool-Using LLM Agents#972506
Record · ID 631979
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive