arXiv (All)
open access
Peerify: Benchmarking Peer-Review Claim Verification
Peer review plays a central role in scholarly publishing, yet verifying whether reviewer claims are supported by manuscript evidence remains a largely manual and time-consuming process. We present Peerify, a pipeline for manuscript-grounded verification of peer-review claims. Given a manuscript and
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ActReview: Rebuttal-Guided Training Data and Rubric Rewards for Actionable Peer Review Generation#986680
- Automated Peer Review and Citation-Grounded Models#687484
- PRISM: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Peer Reviewers#974435
- Beyond the Gatekeeper: A Framework for AI-Assisted Open Peer Review and Decentralized Scientific Evaluation#691781
- Judging a Review by its Cover: A Reliability Analysis of LLM-based Peer Review Evaluation Metrics#1049008
Record · ID 1051539
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive